乙醯磺胺酸鉀
GI(Glucose = 100)
主要來源 · 0 GI
High-intensity sweeteners — no available carbohydrate for classical GI (2020)
Energy(kcal/100g)
主要來源 · 0 kcal/100g
High-intensity sweeteners — no available carbohydrate for classical GI (2020)
Carbs(g/100g)
主要來源 · 0 g/100g
High-intensity sweeteners — no available carbohydrate for classical GI (2020)
Sugars(g/100g)
主要來源 · 0 g/100g
High-intensity sweeteners — no available carbohydrate for classical GI (2020)
風險與副作用
高強度甜味劑
note
Use-level and blends matter. Packet fillers are different products. Regulatory class note — not scored.
FDA — High-intensity sweeteners permitted for use in food (2023)
WHO 不建議用於體重控制
caution
WHO 2023, conditional (low certainty): not for weight control or lowering disease risk — no long-term body-fat benefit. Not a safety ruling. Scored: the energy points it earns over sucrose are taken back on Everyday Health, Weight goals and Easy on the liver; not on Diabetic-friendly (WHO excludes people with diabetes).
WHO — Use of non-sugar sweeteners: WHO guideline (2023)
世代研究發現與冠心病有關聯
note
BMJ 2022 NutriNet-Santé (103,388 adults): HR 1.40 (1.06–1.84). Observational association, not proof of cause. Scored: CV signal −7 on Everyday Health and Weight goals (synthetics are not on Diabetic-friendly; not on Easy on the liver), once per sweetener however many links.
Debras et al. — Artificial sweeteners and risk of cardiovascular diseases: NutriNet-Santé cohort (BMJ) (2022)
世代研究發現與癌症有關聯
note
PLOS Medicine 2022 NutriNet-Santé (102,865 adults): overall cancer HR 1.13 (1.01–1.26) for higher consumers vs non-consumers. Observational association, not proof of cause; no IARC or JECFA cancer finding for acesulfame K. Scored: cancer signal −7 on every list, Easy on the liver included (synthetics are not on Diabetic-friendly).
Debras et al. — Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: NutriNet-Santé cohort (PLOS Medicine) (2022)
這不是醫療建議。若該項目會依公開公式扣分,細節列在「分數怎麼算」;分數不代表臨床嚴重程度。
註記
還沒有額外的背景註記。
註記說明公開軸或風險標籤本身看不出來的事,不是醫療建議。
空白表示目前找不到方法清楚、可引用的資料。表格第一名只代表依公開規則計算後居首,不是醫療認證。